Why do you have to and should you create the layout again in Indesign if it can be I think the counter questions are, “Is a Figma → InDesign workflow common enough that Figma should devote research, design, and development time to accommodating it?” and “Does Figma want its product to be an “everything” tool (like Photoshop)?” Ex: underlining every phone number that follows a specific format.) GREP styles (Using regex to accomplish more complex styling.Nested styles (Ex: Creating a rule inside the Title paragraph style that every character up to the first colon should be bold and orange).Set per-paragraph or per-character styles (including color, case, position, shading, borders, spacing, inheritance, etc).Text wrap (having text flow around a shape).Threaded columns (having text flow automatically from one column to the next).Creating table of contents, footnotes, indexes, bookmarks, or any other kind of in-file navigation. Frame Styles (Ex: every frame using the “Image” style should force text to wrap around it, and any images in the frame should be cropped by a specific amount on all sides.).Creating tables (Including table styles, cell styles, definition of header/footer rows, and page break controls).If you’re going to be doing typesetting with any kind of frequency–or if you value your time, or if you want a marketable skill that will catapult you above designers who can’t be bothered to invest in continuing education–you will not regret learning how to use InDesign.Įdit: And just so folks don’t think I’m exaggerating, here’s a brief list of common typesetting actions InDesign does natively that you either can’t accomplish in Figma or can only do with tedious manual effort: I’ve seen designers make the switch and (metaphorically) slap themselves in the face for the minutes/hours they spent trying to do something in a different tool that InDesign can do in seconds. It looks intimidating at a glance but Adobe’s tutorials are fantastic, and on top of that any familiarity with Photoshop or Illustrator will make the basic functions easier to grok. I go back to what I said: if you’re a graphic designer, you need to learn InDesign. There’s a long list of things that one may need to do for typesetting and copy editing that Figma is incapable of because it wasn’t built for that, and accomplishing those things in Figma equates to an incredible amount of time wasted for the designer and unnecessary cost to the client, who now must pay for all that extra time because the designer doesn’t want to learn a better working method and/or tool. I agree Figma is super intuitive–for UI design.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |